Feasibility and Implementation of a Multimodal Supportive Care Program to Improve Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Increasingly, patients age ≥65 years are undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Although age alone is a well-documented predictor of overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), growing evidence suggests that poor functional status and frailty associated with aging may have roles as well. Our goal in the present study was to identify and improve these and other aging-related maladies by developing a multimodal supportive care program for older allo-SCT recipients. We designed and implemented a multimodal supportive care program, Enhanced Recovery in Stem Cell Transplant (ER-SCT), for patients age ≥65 years undergoing allo-SCT. The ER-SCT program consists of evaluation and critical interventions by key health care providers from multiple disciplines starting before hospital admission for transplantation and extending through 100 days post-allo-SCT. We determined the feasibility of implementing this program in a large stem cell transplantation center. After 1 year of ongoing process improvements, multiple evaluations, and enrollment, we found that a dedicated weekly clinic was necessary to coordinate care and evaluate patients early. We successfully enrolled 57 of 64 eligible patients (89%) in the first year. Our data show that a multimodal supportive care program to enhance recovery for older patients undergoing allo-SCT is feasible. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Cardiac toxicity after matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in the posttransplant cyclophosphamide era.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the leading causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has shown promise in managing GVHD. However, cyclophosphamide has known cardiac toxicity, and few studies have evaluated the cardiac toxicities that arise after PTCy. We completed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent matched-donor allo-HCT at our institution and who received PTCy- or non-PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, with the goal of determining the incidence of cardiac toxicities up to 100 days after allo-HCT. We included 585 patients in our analysis and found that 38 (6.5%) experienced cardiac toxicity after allo-HCT. The toxicities included arrhythmias (n = 21), heart failure (n = 14), pericardial effusion (n = 10), and myocardial infarction or ischemia (n = 7). Patients who received PTCy had a 7.4% incidence of cardiac toxicity, whereas non-PTCy recipients had an incidence of 5.8% (P = .4). We found that age >55 years (P = .02) and a history of hypertension (P = .01), arrhythmia (P = .003), diabetes (P = .04), and cardiac comorbidities (P < .001) were significant predictors of cardiac toxicity, whereas none of the preparative and GVHD prophylaxis regimens were predictive. From these findings, we proposed the use of a Cardiac Risk Stratification Score to quantify the risk of cardiac toxicity after allo-HCT. We found that a higher score correlated with an incidence of cardiac toxicity. Furthermore, the development of cardiac toxicity was associated with worse 1-year overall survival (OS) and NRM. The use of PTCy was associated with improvements in 1-year OS and NRM rates.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide reduces the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) to reverse immune dysfunction. However, a major concern for the use of ICIs after alloHCT is the increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We analyzed the association between GVHD prophylaxis and frequency of GVHD in patients who had received ICI therapy after alloHCT. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 21 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n=16) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=5) who were treated with antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (16 patients) or anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (5 patients) therapy for disease relapse after alloHCT. Associations between the type of GVHD prophylaxis and incidence of GVHD were analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients (19%) developed acute GVHD. The incidence of acute GVHD was associated only with the type of post-transplantation GVHD prophylaxis; none of the other variables included (stem cell source, donor type, age at alloHCT, conditioning regimen and prior history of GVHD) were associated with the frequency of acute GVHD. Twelve patients received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients who received PTCy had a significantly shorter median time to initiation of ICI therapy after alloHCT compared with patients who did not receive PTCy (median 5.1 months compared with 26.6 months). Despite early ICI therapy initiation, patients who received PTCy had a lower observed cumulative incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD compared with patients who did not receive PTCy (16% compared with 22%; p=0.7). After controlling for comorbidities and time from alloHCT to ICI therapy initiation, the analysis showed that PTCy was associated with a 90% reduced risk of acute GVHD (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.6, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ICI therapy for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes after alloHCT may be a safe and feasible option. PTCy appears to decrease the incidence of acute GVHD in this cohort of patients.

Incidence of viral and fungal complications after utilization of alternative donor sources in hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curable option for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. According to guidelines published by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, allogeneic HCT should be offered to all intermediate- and high-risk patients with acute leukemia. While matched-related donor (MRD) grafts continue to be the preferred stem cell source for allogeneic HCT, studies comparing MRD grafts to matched-unrelated donor (MUD) grafts showed comparable outcomes in patients with acute leukemia. Unfortunately, for those without a suitable matched-related graft, the probability of finding a suitable matched-unrelated donor varies significantly depending on racial and ethnic background. With allogeneic HCT procedures increasing year after year due to the increased availability of suitable donors, each of these alternative donor sources merits special clinical considerations, specifically with regard to infections. Infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic transplant, especially in those receiving alternative donor grafts. Due to the high-risk nature associated with these donor grafts, it is important to understand the true risk of developing infectious complications. While there are a multitude of infections that have been described in patients post-allogeneic HCT, this review seeks to focus on the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and invasive fungal infections (IFI) in adult patients receiving alternative donor source transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

Brincidofovir: understanding its unique profile and potential role against adenovirus and other viral infections.

Brincidofovir (BCV) is a lipid conjugate of cidofovir with good oral bioavailability, enabling optimal intracellular levels of the active drug. Lower rates of nephrotoxicity and myelotoxicity make it a favorable alternative. Despite a greater safety profile among pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, the oral formulation has been associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity in adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Oral BCV continues to be developed as a countermeasure against smallpox, while a potentially safer intravenous preparation has been out licensed to another company. BCV has demonstrated great in vitro potency against double-stranded DNA viruses, especially adenovirus. Because of its importance for immunocompromised patients, this review aims to evaluate BCV's clinical and safety profile to support its continued development.

Optimization of intravenous immune globulin use at a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is a high-cost medication used in a diverse range of settings. At many institutions, IVIG is dosed using total body weight (TBW). Recent evidence suggests that alternative dosing weights reduce waste without compromising clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to quantify the waste reduction potential generated through the use of alternative IVIG dosing weights. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all IVIG doses administered from January 2011 through January 2016 to adults (≥18 years). TBW and height at the time of administration were used to calculate prescribed dose (g/kg), ideal body weight (IBW), and adjusted body weight (AdjBW). Three dosing methods were analyzed, as follows: use of AdjBW if TBW is >120% IBW (method 1), AdjBW for all doses (method 2), and IBW for all doses (method 3). Outcomes included potential IVIG use averted, direct drug cost savings, and reductions in outpatient infusion times for each method. RESULTS: A total of 9,918 doses were administered to 2,564 patients over 5 years, representing an average usage of 75,994 g/year. If dosing methods 1, 2, and 3 had been used, the annual use of IVIG would have decreased by 21.9% (16,658 g/year, p < 0.001), 24.2% (18,371 g/year, p < 0.001), and 35.9% (27,252 g/year, p < 0.001), respectively. This translates into average annual cost differences of $2.37 million, $2.62 million, and $3.89 million and average annual outpatient infusion time savings of 841 hours, 920 hours, and 1,366 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: IVIG dosing optimization through use of alternative dosing weights represents a significant source of waste reduction and cost reduction.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefepime in febrile neutropenia: implications for dose-dependent susceptibility and contemporary dosing regimens.

Alterations in cefepime pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and decreased bacterial susceptibility increase the risk of treatment failure. The impact of susceptible-dose-dependent (SDD) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), i.e. 4-8 µg/mL, on target attainment rates for cefepime in febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. We sought to identify optimal cefepime regimens against SDD cefepime MICs in FN using a modelling and simulation approach. Creatinine clearance (CLCr) and body surface area (BSA) covariate-adjusted models of clearance were evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations representing 10 000 patients were completed to assess various dosing strategies (i.e. 3-8 g/day infused over 0.5-24 h, replaced every 6-24 h) and predict probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) for unbound cefepime. Nine patients received cefepime 2 g every 8 h (q8h) (0.5-h infusion). A two-compartment PK model with BSA- and CLCr-adjusted clearance was fit to the data. Mean population values for total clearance (6.3 ± 1.1 L/h), intercompartmental clearance (6.9 ± 2.8 L/h), and central (14.8 ± 3.8 L) and peripheral (10.9 ± 4.6 L) distribution volumes were all estimated with <50% CV. Simulated dosing regimens of 3-4 g/day administered as continuous infusions and doses of 2 g administered q6h (0-5 h infusion) to q8h (4-h infusion) achieved ≥90% PTA at MICs up to 8 µg/mL. Simulated regimens of 1 g q8h (4-h infusion) or 1 g q6h (0.5-h infusion) achieved ≥90% PTA only against MICs up to 4 µg/mL. High-dose prolonged infusion or more frequent cefepime regimens may be necessary to treat FN organisms with SDD MICs.

Pharmacokinetics of Cefepime in Patients with Cancer and Febrile Neutropenia in the Setting of Hematologic Malignancies or Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of standard cefepime dosing regimens in a hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant patient population with febrile neutropenia. DESIGN: Open-label, single-center, prospective pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. PATIENTS: Nine adults with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic cell transplants who had febrile neutropenia and were admitted to a hematology-oncology service between January and July 2014. INTERVENTION: Patients received empirical cefepime 2 g every 8 hours, administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion, for febrile neutropenia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Steady-state cefepime serum concentrations were measured after at least 2 days of continuous therapy. Venous blood samples were intensively sampled between 0 and 8 hours after the start of the 30-minute infusion at steady state. Seven of the nine patients had a hematologic malignancy diagnosis of acute leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma, and two patients had a germ cell tumor diagnosis. Noncompartmental analysis revealed mean ± SD parameters as follows at steady state: area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-8 hours 222.9 ± 72.9 mg hour/L, maximum concentration 120.9 ± 21.8 mg/L, clearance 9.7 ± 3.7 L/hour, apparent volume of distribution 19.2 ± 4.65 L, and elimination half-life 1.4 ± 0.3 hours. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model identified a mean ± SD volume of distribution of 20.9 ± 1.3 L and an elimination rate constant of 0.39 ± 0.03 hour(-1) . The mean estimated percentage of time that drug concentration remains above the pathogen minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) in serum was 55%, 77%, and 99% at MICs of 16, 8, and 4 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic cell transplants who had febrile neutropenia demonstrated homogeneous calculated cefepime volumes and clearances. The population parameters presented in this study may aid in the calculation of patient-specific fT>MIC for similar patients.

Evaluation of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a major early complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is a risk factor for chronic rejection. Induction immunosuppression has been used as a strategy to reduce early ACR. Recently, our LT program changed our primary induction protocol from basiliximab with standard maintenance immunosuppression to alemtuzumab induction with reduced dose maintenance immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to compare incidence of ACR after this change in the first 6 months after transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort review of patients 18 years or older, which received their first LT between January 2010 and September 2012. RESULTS: The primary outcome was comparison of average lung biopsy scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included development of grade A2 or higher rejection, infectious outcomes, overall graft and patient survival. At 6 months, the average biopsy score was significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group than the basiliximab group (0.12 ± 0.29 vs 0.74 ± 0.67; P < 0.0001) (Table 2). Grade 2 or higher rejection was significantly higher in the basiliximab group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Alemtuzumab provided superior outcomes in regard to average biopsy score and lower incidence of grade 2 or higher rejection at 6 months. There were no differences in infectious complications or overall graft or patient survival between the 2 groups.